Wait a second, haven’t I heard that “Corsci” name before?
Isn't he the guy who's selling lots of books thereby proving how right P.T. Barnum was?
So, you’re ok with the US being under UN law?
Who knows what you have heard.
You need to fix those hearing aids of yours! ;-)
As for your spelling, that is likely going to require you use spell-check more often.
Absolutely devastating admissions within their little conclave surfaced, totally confounding the talking points meant to dupe the "loud people".
Note this one from Ken Weinstein, CEO of Hudson Institute:
"And the lack of transparency has really denied us that ability to know whether what’s going on is something we should be alarmed about or not. And I think that opening this process up would really reveal, for the most part, that a lot of the areas are dull and they don’t affect us that much – or they’ll affect narrow interests but not more broadly.""So I think if I were advising the administration, I’d say you have nothing really to fear by transparency. The extent of transparency would be good, and by bringing in Congress in, you have a way of achieving that , and that will give people – the average voter – a greater sense that this is being overseen. And having done that, yes, you’ll have some extra roadblocks; there’s no doubt. But by and large, your freedom of action won’t be much constrained that the governments will be able to proceed on every reasonable measure where they’re trying to do something. And so, I don’t think there’s really any reason to fear transparency.
But for some reason, it’s been there.
I don’t know whether the administration is thinking about it. I’m also curious if the Canadian and Mexican governments looking at this might want to say, for their part, United States, you really need to help us address this, because we realize this whole thing could die in the U.S. and we need things out of this process in Canada, Mexico, so it’s in our interest for you to deal with this as well."
Perhaps the covert operations approach is embraced because the end results are indeed not "reasonable measures", and are in fact significantly different from what Weinstein presupposes, or has been informed, as to what...ultimately...is going on.
NOTE: He is not in the "Loop." He reveals that when he says: "If I were advising the President...."
But he isn't. Pastor et al., likely won't be inviting either Ken Weinstein or John Fonte to a Presidential pow-wow any time soon, I suspect...