Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: taildragger

I don’t see the point. It’s like a diesel, but less flexible, and requires a specific fuel with less energy density. Where’s the advantage?


16 posted on 08/24/2007 6:53:20 AM PDT by B Knotts (Anybody but Giuliani!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
Less weight and cost of a Diesel to name two.

I now I am going to get grief from the latest generation Diesel folks, but non of the cold weather issues, and some of the Diesel high cost add-on band aids like Urea canisters etc. to meet emissions.

From what I read fuel economy in narrow bands increases as much as 40% and emissions can drop as much as 80%.

Also I have read it works better with poorer grade fuels, (less octane) which opens up all sorts of possibilities.

Google HCCI, interesting stuff....

I see it at the "Holy-Grail" for Piston Engines at this time.

BTW, there is a diesel version of this technology the acronym is PCCI (?).

17 posted on 08/24/2007 8:22:14 AM PDT by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson