Zero.
Amount of corroborating evidence of Matt Winkler's supposed "abuse", period?
Zero.
Collective IQ of the jury?:
The sum of the previous two.
“Collective IQ of the jury?:”
Heh, a 10 woman, 2 man jury is not “stacked” in a case like this?
Her own daughter testified that the father never laid a hand on Winkler. She got away with cold-blooded murder of a man because some women thought it was OK.
A jury of women tutored by Oprah, no doubt.
Seriously frightening.
Chance of a wife-killing husband receiving a similar pass, regardless of what he testifies occurred in their marriage.
Zero.
I have always found it bizarre that testimony of the “perp” or “victim” is accepted as evidence. What this turns the case into is a question of who tells their story better, with no correlation to the truth at all.
We’ve all known people who could tell a lie more believably than others we’ve known could tell the truth.