Posted on 08/12/2007 8:55:08 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
I might buy that in the case of static linking. Dynamic linking OTOH is just automating the process you would do if you operated the GPL’ed program manually, so I’m not buying that, no matter what Stallman says.
Same here. That's why, as I've said, I prefer the clearer MPL.
Ridiculous. It's copyLEFT you support, traditional copyRIGHT owners like Microsoft and Oracle you constantly smear. LOL who do you think your lies are fooling?
"Copyleft" can't exist without "traditional" copyright. Even supporters of "copyleft" have to support copyright, otherwise they're hypocrites.
, traditional copyRIGHT owners like Microsoft and Oracle you constantly smear
I have supported Microsoft's copyrights on this board. I deride upsets in the balance of copyright. I deride abuse of copyright, as in copyright holders trying to claim rights far beyond those granted by law, and Congress granting rights far beyond those allowed by the Constitution. My record is very clear on this.
Which is of course the only time you support copyright, so you can enforce copyLEFT as directed by green party moonbat Stallman. LOL your very fist post to this site was an attack on copyright and has continued ever since. Your posting history is as far as anyone needs to go to find the truth, if lurkers ask for links it will take no time to find your attacks on copyright starting with your very first post to this board, it's apparrently why you even exist here, that and defending foreign produsts and hackers.
IM sorry for butting in here but can you point to a post where AR does *not* support copyright?
Go check his posting history starting with his very first post to this board. But when you come back and say there are none I’ll be able to bust you both, again.
Please provide a link, I’m not going to let you make a bulk accusation and the ask me to do you’re research for you..
LOL you wouldn’t have to look far and know it, as I said if any respectable lurkers doubt it, which I doubt, I’ll be happy to link them.
GE,
You cant just accuse someone of something and the post *no* proof instead demanding that other people go do it for you!
I said his very first post to this board, and countless others. I also said if anyone other than another lunix fanboi asks I’ll be glad to link it. Go find a single post where he praises existing copyright law or private property ownership and bring it then, if you think it exists. If one does actually exist (it might since he constantly talks in circles) I can find two where he attacks copyright.
Yet you wont link it, thats all Im asking
Yes I will, just as I said, if an honest person asks. Linux fanatics who try to compare Linus Torvalds to Ben Franklin simply aren’t worth the time LOL.
Now I remember why I put my troll filter up, you're like talking to a bot, a badly written bot. I never compared the two I used them as an example of the conclusion of your Maoist tendencies to confer guilt on someone due to familial ties.
FYI, SCO now down to .37, market cap is under $8 million. Do they have enough to pay what they owe to Novell? To Red Hat since they’ll now win their claim?
He only lost if he didn’t get paid. The losers here are the SCO shareholders who just took a hit, and the shareholders who are still holding on to the overvalued .40 per share stock.
Ouch that people are dumb enough to buy stock in a company with more liabilities than assets, even at 40 cents a share it is overvalued.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.