Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vharlow
...I don't understand what could have come to light that would preclude Lisa from getting these things, the insurance money, and the oil leases that would have been rightfully the family's upon Vince's death. They were married, legally, living together as husband and wife...What would have prevented her just claim on these things?

The relationship between the two was going poorly, and they had in fact been living apart - a thousand miles apart - for five months before Lisa joined VWF in DC as supposedly "a last-ditch attempt to save the marriage." There was a pretty decent chance that each was seeing other people during that split up time. (That's merely some useful background.)

The life insurance policy paid off even in the event of "suicide" of the insured (quite unusual) but would certainly not have paid off if Lisa had participated in the murder plot. The fact is that there were powerful financial incentives for her to participate in the plot - and the cover-up of the murder as a "suicide." But these financial incentives would not be in place had she not seen to it that (1) the last insurance premium payment had been mailed and postmarked one day before the death and (2) the paperwork for the transfer of the oil leases from Vince's mother to Vince had been completed before the death. So the very fact that she told her husband to be sure to mail those two items from the WH on the day before the death was either (1) very good timing for Lisa by sheer coincidence or (2) sususpiciously suggestive that Lisa had foreknowledge of what was about to happen and was (affirmatively) preparing for it.

Lisa's actions on the day of the death and her avid participation in the cover-up are darn convincing of her involvement, to say nothing of the fact that she got lawyered up with a top notch Clintonista Washington criminal attorney immediately - despite the fact that she had only been in DC about a month.

18 posted on 08/16/2007 8:56:47 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93
Where are you getting these facts? What's your source on the life insurance policy? I was a licensed agent for years, and while a suicide clause is contained in most policies, that expires after usually 2 years. There's nothing unusual about that. Where did you get the information about WHEN the premium was mailed, when the oil leases were signed, etc? Even in the case of divorce, many divorce agreements include provisions that require life insurance policies to name the spouse as beneficiary, and I don't think those benefits would have been lost if someone other than Lisa killed him. People of that class don't divorce or split up with children without making provision for the ex-spouse that are usually quite comfortable.

I'm not saying she didn't participate in the cover up, but I just don't see any reason to assume she was complicit in the death itself.

My belief would be that she participated out of fear of the Clintons.

What I cannot understand about his family is why none of his children have sought greater knowledge about the death since they are already grown. Indeed, I suspect more fear.

20 posted on 08/16/2007 10:31:31 AM PDT by vharlow (http://www.vventures.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson