Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: leilani

I like how they dance around the issue of Discovery’s sponsorship - my view is, and Discovery wouldn’t want to admit this, is that Discovery signed on because of Armstrong. Sure, they sponsor the entire team, and it’s good that they still got a winner (not exactly hard considering how many teams lost their stars to doping this Tour) but let’s be blunt, they were after Armstrong’s celebrity, and now that he’s retired, and American interest has dropped, their continued investment is not worth the rewards (or lack thereof).


5 posted on 08/10/2007 10:10:33 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_rr

You’re probably right. And if they were looking for an excuse they surely got one to dump Lance-less cycling - in spades.


6 posted on 08/10/2007 10:13:36 AM PDT by leilani (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: af_vet_rr

From what I’ve read in other sources, Discovery’s leadership changed. Simply put, the new ruling junta did not want to sponsor Armstrong’s team while the outgoing president did.

I have to wonder if the Versus channel will continue to cover the TdF next year? Versus viewership for this year’s Tdf was in the 21-22 million range. Not too bad and certainly more than the barbaric so called mixed martial arts matches. I wish Versus would also cover the Tour of California or Georgia.


21 posted on 08/11/2007 4:51:04 PM PDT by miele man (Continually voting against iodine deficient libs for 42 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson