From a guy that doesn’t know degrees from radians. Next.
“From a guy that doesn’t know degrees from radians. Next.”
Eyes Wide Shut. This close-minded dismissiveness even of peer-reviewed work that is not part of the ‘consensus’ is common from the ‘community’ of AGW alarmists, I’ve noticed this attitude on e.g., climatescience.org.
maybe it’s par for the course on FR to reach for ad hominem without addressing the point, but it’s irksome, unwarranted, and unscientific.
If warming trends correlate to sociological non-climate factors, it puts into question whether adjustments are being properly done.