Skip to comments.
Mortgage Fears Drive Up Rates on Jumbo Loans
http://finance.yahoo.com/loans/article/103339/Mortgage-Fears-Drive-Up-Rates-on-Jumbo-Loans ^
| 8-7-07
| James R. Hagerty
Posted on 08/08/2007 8:02:48 AM PDT by Hydroshock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
To: Hydroshock
You applied more care than the typical borrower, but to what degree did your eventual lender illustrate financial scenarios?
My point is...that's the question that should be explored. Accountants can't do that, and lawyers can't do that.
In fact, many lenders can't.
61
posted on
08/08/2007 11:19:46 AM PDT
by
gogeo
(Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
To: gogeo
62
posted on
08/08/2007 11:23:34 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: RockinRight
Been there, done that. Unfortunately, that’s what conventional wisdom calls “smart shopping.”
63
posted on
08/08/2007 11:25:28 AM PDT
by
gogeo
(Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
To: gogeo
That is part of the problem, People do not think.
64
posted on
08/08/2007 11:25:41 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: RockinRight
Okay, but that doesn’t change the fact that if someone has 50% of their gross income going to housing, they automatically are left with only a few hundred dollars per month. That’s why I say it “depends”.
I’m not suggesting people should do it, only stating 50% can make sense for some people.....certainly not a majority, but they are out there and can handle it just fine.
There are also people who can meet a 36% ratio that I wouldn’t loan lunch money to.
To: jennyjenny
66
posted on
08/08/2007 11:42:53 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Fred's Campaign: A hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close.)
To: gogeo
you as a laymanOver 20 years in secured lending and loan collection. It was clear up front what bank was doing the underwriting and would own the paper (at least until it could be packaged). But, in fact, they set it up as a loan from the broker with an immeidate assignment. At the time, my assumption was that the lending bank wanted to try to avoid any agency liability for anything the guy might have said or promised. But the deal itself was fairly transparent.
67
posted on
08/08/2007 11:52:11 AM PDT
by
PAR35
To: PAR35
I thought you had some background.
The "broker" it appears was actually a correspondent lender, therefore acting as a banker himself.
68
posted on
08/08/2007 12:26:23 PM PDT
by
gogeo
(Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
To: Mo1
“I guess it’s all about priorities and what’s really important.”
You said it. We bought a few years ago. We were financed for twice what we spent. You don’t have to spend it all. Some folks don’t realize that, I guess.
69
posted on
08/08/2007 12:59:30 PM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: martin_fierro
A couple of years from now, Mr.Cecere will view the fact that he did not get approved for this toxic loan as a major stroke of luck.
70
posted on
08/09/2007 7:28:38 AM PDT
by
Notary Sojac
(Be joyful, even though you've checked out the facts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson