[BlueDragon]

"....if you see someone calling them self a Darwinist or referring to Darwinists as if they exist today you can be you are talking to someone without much science knowledge."

Uh, what about this guy?

Named, or called by some, "Darwin's Rottweiler".

Perhaps you may wish to re-think that particular, shoot-from-the-lip statement?

[gondramB]

>>Perhaps you may wish to re-think that particular, shoot-from-the-lip statement?<<

Really, he self identifies as a Darwinist? I can’t find anywhere he does that. I know literally thousands of professional scientists and have never any one of them call himself a Darwinist.

Darwin is from the 1800’s - a lot has changed since then. They didn’t know about atoms, much less DNA.

But I could modify my statement a little bit

“if you see someone calling them self a Darwinist or referring to Darwinists as if they exist today you can be ALMOST CERTAIN that you are talking to someone without much science knowledge or SOMEONE DELIBERATELY DISTORTING THE TRUTH.”