no i have not missed the point, all the ‘lines of evidence’ that you claim verify each other are all based on the usual, starting assumptions that cant be verified and starting assumptions THAT GUARANTEE the end result needed to prop up the paradigm.
amazing that folks dont want to admit that.
[[no i have not missed the point, all the ‘lines of evidence’ that you claim verify each other are all based on the usual, starting assumptions that cant be verified and starting assumptions THAT GUARANTEE the end result needed to prop up the paradigm.
amazing that folks dont want to admit that]]
Bingo that prettyy much sums it up exactly. Evolution- Taking God’s design patterns and using it to ‘predict’ what should be seen, and walla- by gosh by golly- finding it, and finding that the MICROevolutionary changes that are based on biological fact do infact indeed happenb, and hten proposing it crosses major taxons with nothign to back it all up but assumptions.
Animals with toes that resemble the basic physiological model of a horse? Gasp! There was another animal at soem time that looked similiar to a horse? God just couldn’t have used workqable models on all animals and created similiar looking but completely different species- ohg heck no- that couldn’;t even be a ‘scientific’ possibility- the one had to evolve inbto the other and that is that!