I didn’t bring up my qualifications to try an ‘appeal to authority’. You asked and I answered truthfully. I avoid stating my credentials because scientific debate is settled (or should be) on the strength of data not the credentials of the person proffering it.
So enough of the run-around. Do you have an answer or a theory as to why more polyandrous species would have stronger male signals for placental growth?
“Saying I am lying about my credentials...”
I question them...and I still do.
“...and then saying that even if I did have those credentials all I was qualified for was sweeping up the lab wasn’t an attack?”
No, not really...it was an honest observation. Your intellect in using logic during this discussion is much lower than found on this site so I just made an honest analysis.
Sorry if I ruffled your feathers.
“I didn’t bring up my qualifications to try an ‘appeal to authority’.”
I will just say it seems that your trying to impress someone.
You seem to be trying to play a shell game with the questions in order to prove that evolution has some predictive ability.
Evolution does not merit anything of value to the sciences that have been stated here in this forum...as much as you do not like that... its just a fact.