One of your problems, and that of youre fellows, is you have no concept of what constitutes scientific evidence. Consequently, not only do you look silly to we who do understand, but you miss chances for legitimate criticisms. There is a deficiency in the analysis (or at least the reporting of it), but you’ll never figure it out.
==One of your problems, and that of youre fellows, is you have no concept of what constitutes scientific evidence.
Sure I do, that’s why I’m busy refuting the myth of Darwinian evolution.