See, that's what you just don't get. Scientific theories are based on huge banks of scientific evidence. There's no single "magic bullet" that proves evolution, or any other theory. I have no desire to debate you on solidly established scientific theories that span multiple disciplines. Science has done an excellent job of piecing together evidence to form coherent theories, and it's not my job (or anyone else's) to spend time teaching them to you. The work's already been done - the onus is on you to understand it, and if, after that happens, you have the inclination to challenge aspects of a theory, by all means, that's what peer review is for. Until then, you are impugned by your lack of credibility, and you'll have to remain in the dark as to what scientists understand about evolution, but that's through your own choosing.
I understand enough to know the Darwinian ToE has been thoroughly refuted. And since you’re not game, I guess we’ll just have to leave it at that.