| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 01/03/2008 6:41:54 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Please direct your comments here: |
Posted on 08/07/2007 7:52:15 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
Maybe she changed over time or just made one mistake that lead to another and so forth. You need to make her have been good/worth loving at some point to keep the angst levels for the not-murderer nice and high.
I’m going back and forth between gradual downward spiral and a twisted past that she had escaped, but relapsed under bad influences from murderer.
Both have good possibilities. And both lead to plenty of “why didn’t I see until it was too late?” kinds of painful moments for not-murderer.
dunno, ask Tony Alameida.
Post-modernism is total crap, but unfortunately it’s what sells now. There’s no accounting for taste, I guess.
er, Almeida.
This is why I only read science fiction.
Science fiction, the real post-modernism!
or, for that matter, Bobby Ewing...
Some people are too young to get that reference. ;)
Maybe it should not be at all clear which way it went (spiral or backslide). That gives the non-murder even MORE to agonize about.
The sci-fi trend I don’t care for is post-humanism. As in, uploading your consciousness into a couch or a flock of birds. I picked up an anthology of short stories last year that was supposedly the best of the best and it was a miserable slog through story after story were humans were so bored with living they entertained themselves by finding new ways to kill themselves and then reincarnate in other forms. When do we stop being human? Are we there yet? *yawn*
Yeah. Found that one out already.
Yeah...but if she was very naive and innocent when he met her and went through the whole downward spiral on his watch, he gets to feel guilty for not protecting her.
That’s kind of nice...
But it’s harder to write. Especially since I’d have to have some other reason for her getting involved with murderer, rather than him just being a “friend” from a past life, coming back to haunt her.
er, the previous should read transhumanism. I think.
Spielberg seems to like such things. The point of a lot of his movies seems to be that there’s nothing truly special about human beings. No soul. If we could put human intelligence in a machine, there’s no difference.
With all this activity this is going to be a hard one to spam.
It is still worth a shot though, Precious.
Mine?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.