Posted on 07/24/2007 3:27:40 PM PDT by SJackson
You forgot to put NUTJOB ALERT next to the title.
Is that ever true.
I have a funny feeling that this is not the first time PCR has claimed Bush will stage another 9/11-style attack. I’m not planning on dredging-around Lew Rockwell & Antiwar.com to find out, though.
“Bush isin’t smart enuff to plan anything...”
At least President Bush can spell.
Roberts is a union-bought protectionist. Rightwingers support free enterprise.
troll
angelcindy
Since Jun 26, 2007
*PING* !
Cool. Looks like Art Bell has a replacement.
Roberts’ economic policies are more similar to those of leftist Juan Peron than they are to right-wingers.
Not with a good outcome anyway.
ping.
Wouldn't surprise me, another Gulf of Tonkin, though a bad comparison, that was manipulation of the incident, not creation, has been an issue lately.
Ever since the 1972 Nixon re-election campaign we have been episodically treated to this peculiar bit of leftwing crackpot paranoia. Of course, the basis for paranoia is denial and projection. It is Roberts and his deranged leftwing cronies who lust for autocratic power.
Yep. Roberts wants to use the power of the state to control the economy. Sounds like a far-left socialist to me.
There are plenty of conspiracy theorists out there just waiting for another attack so they can say: "See!!! I told you so!!! "I'm Smart and your stupid."
Yup, they have nothing better to do with their lives than try to be nut job king of the castle.
Wikipedia has some interesting quotes. If they are accurate, the guy is a total loon.
Mainstream media
“Anyone who depends on print, TV, or right-wing talk radio media is totally misinformed. The Bush administration has achieved a de facto Ministry of Propaganda.” [5]
“The uniformity of the US media has become much more complete since the days of the cold war. During the 1990s, the US government permitted an unconscionable concentration of print and broadcast media that terminated the independence of the media. Today the US media is owned by 5 giant companies in which pro-Zionist Jews have disproportionate influence. More importantly, the values of the conglomerates reside in the broadcast licenses, which are granted by the government, and the corporations are run by corporate executives—not by journalists—whose eyes are on advertising revenues and the avoidance of controversy that might produce boycotts or upset advertisers and subscribers. Americans who rely on the totally corrupt corporate media have no idea what is happening anywhere on earth, much less at home.”[6]
September 11, 2001 attacks
Of the 9/11 Commission Report he wrote in 2006, “One would think that if the report could stand analysis, there would not be a taboo against calling attention to the inadequacy of its explanations.” (see Criticisms of the 9/11 Commission Report). He has reported what he says are findings by experts that conclude there is a large energy deficit in the official account of the collapse of the three WTC buildings, and says that this deficit remains unexplained.
Roberts, a supply-side economist, comments on the “scientific impossibility” of the official explanation for the events on 9/11 and says those engineers and physicists who accept this theory are wrong. On August 18, 2006, he wrote:
I will begin by stating what we know to be a solid incontrovertible scientific fact. We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to “pancake” at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false... Since the damning incontrovertible fact has not been investigated, speculation and “conspiracy theories” have filled the void. Some of the speculation is based on circumstantial evidence and is plausible. Other of the speculation is untenable, and it is used to protect the official explanation by branding all skeptics “conspiracy theorists.” The Popular Mechanics article and the TV documentary are obviously false since they both endorse the official explanation that the WTC buildings “pancaked” at free fall speed, an obvious scientific impossibility. [4]
On September 14, 2006, he wrote:
The explanation that the three WTC buildings collapsed as a result of damage and fire is a mere assertion. The assertion is not backed up with scientific calculation to demonstrate that the energy from the airliners, fire, and gravity were sufficient to collapse the buildings. A number of independent authorities believe that there is a very large energy deficit in the official account of the collapse of the buildings. Until this issue is resolved, the official explanation is merely an assertion no matter who believes it. [4]
On September 7, 2006,he wrote:
I do not know what happened on 9/11, and I don’t expect to ever find out. Neither government nor media show any interest in providing us with anything except a political commission’s report. [4]
He's not gone this far, but same mindset among many of his supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.