Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protesters to converge on North America summit
World Net Daily ^ | June 20, 2007

Posted on 07/15/2007 12:11:18 PM PDT by processing please hold

Activists already are preparing to protest the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, a trilateral initiative between the U.S., Canada and Mexico seen by critics as a major step toward a North American Union, according to WND columnist Jerome Corsi, author of a new book on the subject, "The Late Great USA."

The meeting, which has received almost no mention in the U.S. mainstream media, is scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is scheduled to host the Quebec summit, which will be attended by Mexican President Felipe Calderon and President Bush.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: border; canada; cuespookymusic; duncanhunter; fredthompson; mexico; nau; northamericanunion; spp; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580581-582 next last
To: processing please hold

In dollars, or ameros?


541 posted on 07/19/2007 10:15:37 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You’re right. It’s all Corsi. He invented the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, to throw us off, to garner a name for himself. Damn you’re a genius.


542 posted on 07/19/2007 10:16:28 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

ameros if you please, I’ll convert it later.


543 posted on 07/19/2007 10:17:19 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Do you believe the SPP is working toward a NAU?


544 posted on 07/19/2007 11:54:05 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
No. And if they were, the SPP is not the US Senate, House or President and has no power to create an NAU.
545 posted on 07/19/2007 11:55:53 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Do you believe the president supports the SPP?


546 posted on 07/19/2007 12:01:48 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
I don’t know, does he?

I was bothered when he said this before he was elected..

We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.

It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.

No one can say at this point precisely what form future cooperation among our three countries will take. But if I am elected President, I would be willing to invite each of our neighbors to send a special representative to our government to sit in on high level planning sessions with us, as partners, mutually concerned about the future of our continent. First, I would immediately seek the views and ideas of Canadian and Mexican leaders on this issue, and work tirelessly with them to develop closer ties among our peoples. It is time we stopped thinking of our nearest neighbors as foreigners.

By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale. We will put to rest any doubts of those cynical enough to believe that the United States would seek to dominate any relationship among our three countries, or foolish enough to think that the governments and peoples of Canada and Mexico would ever permit such domination to occur. I for one, am confident that we can show the world by example that the nations of North America are ready, within the context of an unswerving commitment to freedom, to see new forms of accommodation to meet a changing world. A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friends and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident of our future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries. Two hundred years ago, we taught the world that a new form of government, created out of the genius of man to cope with his circumstances, could succeed in bringing a measure of quality to human life previously thought impossible.

It sounds like the SPP, doesn't it?

547 posted on 07/19/2007 12:08:38 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Excellent article, thanks.

I don’t know, does he?

Yes he does. The article below confirms it. He's pushing the SPP.

It sounds like the SPP, doesn't it?

It does. I'm sure you know that the SPP works out of the Department of Commerce.

This is what the WH says about the SPP .

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: Progress

RSS Feed White House News

Canada, Mexico and the United States share a continued commitment to enhance the security, prosperity and quality of life of our citizens within North America. We recognize that the success of our countries is enhanced by working cooperatively. The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, which celebrates its first anniversary this month, provides a framework for us to advance collaboration in areas as diverse as security, transportation, the environment and public health.

This Partnership has increased our institutional contacts to respond to our vision of a stronger, more secure, and more prosperous region. In June 2005, our three governments released detailed work-plans identifying key initiatives that form an ambitious agenda of collaboration. Since June, we have worked to implement these initiatives. Many will take months or years to be completed, but we already note significant results. We ask our Ministers to build on this momentum.

We have discussed how we can ensure North America is the most economically dynamic region in the world and a secure home for our citizens. Today, we exchanged views with private sector leaders on how to enhance the competitiveness of North America.

Building on existing commitments, we agree that priority initiatives warrant special attention in the coming year:

Strengthening Competitiveness in North America. We are pleased to announce the creation of a North American Competitiveness Council (NACC). The Council will comprise members of the private sector from each country and will provide us recommendations on North American competitiveness, including, among others, areas such as automotive and transportation, steel, manufacturing, and services. The Council will meet annually with security and prosperity Ministers and will engage with senior government officials on an ongoing basis.

We are convinced that regulatory cooperation advances the productivity and competitiveness of our nations and helps to protect our health, safety and environment. For instance, cooperation on food safety will help protect the public while at the same time facilitate the flow of goods. We affirm our commitment to strengthen regulatory cooperation in this and other key sectors and to have our central regulatory agencies complete a trilateral regulatory cooperation framework by 2007.

North American Emergency Management. A disaster - whether natural or man-made - in one of our countries can have consequences across national borders. Our vision for a North American response, relief and recovery strategy would ensure that critical equipment, supplies and personnel can be deployed expeditiously throughout North America. We commit to develop a common approach to critical infrastructure protection, coordinated responses to cross border incidents, and coordinated training and exercises, with the participation of all levels of government in our countries.

Avian and Human Pandemic Influenza. Given the highly integrated nature of our economies, an outbreak of pathogenic avian flu or human pandemic influenza in any one of our countries would affect us all. Today, we have agreed to develop a comprehensive, science-based and coordinated approach within North America to avian influenza and human pandemic influenza management. We have endorsed a set of shared principles to underpin cooperative activities by our Governments in all stages of avian influenza and human pandemic influenza management: prevention; preparedness; response; and recovery. Pursuant to these principles, officials will develop, as an immediate priority, incident management protocols to ensure that we are well prepared in advance of an outbreak in North America. For instance, we have agreed to work together to accelerate research, development, production, and availability of human pandemic influenza vaccines, and develop a strategy to best facilitate the sharing of information to enhance the availability of vaccines to the region. We will also establish a small Coordinating Body of senior officials to ensure follow-up on these commitments.

North American Energy Security. A sustainable, secure and affordable supply of energy is key to fueling the North American economy. Collaboration in the areas of innovation, energy efficiency, and technology development, including moving these technologies to market, promotes energy security. Our governments renew their commitment to trilateral cooperation on clean energy technologies, conservation, and market facilitation as a means to meeting our shared goals of energy security and sustainable development. Officials will also examine how this cooperation can be expanded to further our climate efforts.

North American Smart, Secure Borders. Our vision is to have a border strategy that results in the fast, efficient and secure movement of low-risk trade and travelers to and within North America, while protecting us from threats including terrorism. In implementing this strategy, we will encourage innovative risk-based approaches to improving security and facilitating trade and travel. These include close coordination on infrastructure investments and vulnerability assessments, screening and processing of travelers, baggage and cargo, a single integrated North American trusted traveler program, and swift law enforcement responses to threats posed by criminals or terrorists, including advancing a trilateral network for the protection of judges and officers.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America represents a broad and ambitious agenda. We instruct our Ministers to develop options to strengthen the SPP and present them next June as part of the second report on progress of the SPP.

President Fox and President Bush were pleased to accept, on behalf of their countries, Prime Minister Harper's invitation to host the next trilateral leaders meeting in Canada in 2007.

Emphasis mine. Their next meeting is next month in Canada. This is but one of many articles directly from the WH supporting the SPP.

What do you suppose they mean by..."trilateral network for the protection of judges and officers ". Protect them from what?

548 posted on 07/19/2007 12:28:24 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
What do you make of this?

W HAT WE SHOULD DO BY 2010 • LaythegroundworkforthefreerflowofpeoplewithinNorth America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the currentintensityofthegovernments’physicalcontrolofcross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening oftravelersfromthirdcountriesattheirfirstpointofentryintoNorth America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America

Please correct me if I'm mistaken but aren't they talking about erasing borders?

549 posted on 07/19/2007 1:02:24 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
It sounds like the SPP, doesn't it?

It does.

If you heard Bush give this speech, would you have voted for him?

I'm sure you know that the SPP works out of the Department of Commerce.

I didn't know. Does that make it better or worse?

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, which celebrates its first anniversary this month, provides a framework for us to advance collaboration in areas as diverse as security, transportation, the environment and public health.

Shouldn't they work to improve security, transportation, the environment and public health?

We have discussed how we can ensure North America is the most economically dynamic region in the world and a secure home for our citizens.

How is that bad?

including advancing a trilateral network for the protection of judges and officers.

Protecting judges and officers is bad?

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America represents a broad and ambitious agenda. We instruct our Ministers to develop options to strengthen the SPP and present them next June as part of the second report on progress of the SPP.

Help me out, none of the stuff you pasted here looks bad. If it's not bad, why is strengthening the SPP bad?

What do you suppose they mean by..."trilateral network for the protection of judges and officers ". Protect them from what?

From bad guys?

550 posted on 07/19/2007 1:21:50 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
If you heard Bush give this speech, would you have voted for him?

I wouldn't have voted at all. I damned sure wouldn't have voted for skerry. I'd have sat home with my crocheting.

A lot worse. It shows big business and cheap labor(illegal aliens)has their hand in it.

Why should any American care about mexico's health issues. I don't worry about Irelands health system. There was a time when anyone entering the US had to undergo a medical screening before being allowed in. We need to bring that system back. We'd improve our security by shutting down the border as it should have been on 9-12, and these horrible diseases that are finding their way into our country.

We have discussed how we can ensure North Americais the most economically dynamic region in the world and a secure home for our citizens.

We aren't even referred to as US citizens, we're all clumped together into North American citizens.

Protecting judges and officers is bad?

I guess that would depend on what they were judging. If it's to erase our sovereignty I image they will need protection.

Help me out, none of the stuff you pasted here looks bad. If it's not bad, why is strengthening the SPP bad?

You know my opinion on that, it's no secret. I can't tell you why it's bad, that's for each individual to decide on their own. Some things can be learned, some or inherent. I'm a citizen of the United States of America, not an North American Union citizen.

551 posted on 07/19/2007 1:46:00 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
I wouldn't have voted at all. I damned sure wouldn't have voted for skerry.

What about Carter or Mondale? Would you have voted for them? That wasn't a Bush speech, it was a Reagan speech.

We'd improve our security by shutting down the border as it should have been on 9-12, and these horrible diseases that are finding their way into our country.

I agree. It's scary that polio and TB are making a comeback.

I can't tell you why it's bad,

And you can't show me either.

I'm a citizen of the United States of America, not an North American Union citizen.

Me too!

552 posted on 07/19/2007 1:55:50 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I did vote for Carter, and Mondale and Ferreiro(spel?). I was a dim and voted for dims from the time I was old enough to vote till 9-11. That awoke me to the danger my country was in from islamofascist and those who want to strip us of our country. I had an epiphany and I haven’t looked back since. I’m referred to as a 9-11 republican.


553 posted on 07/19/2007 2:04:13 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
That wasn't a Bush speech, it was a Reagan speech.

I didn't vote for Reagan. So I guess you have your answer none the less.

554 posted on 07/19/2007 2:06:35 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
I did vote for Carter, and Mondale and Ferreiro(spel?).

Well, that explains a few things. Glad you finally came around.

555 posted on 07/19/2007 2:12:28 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Well, that explains a few things.

Now I'm curious, explains what?

Glad you finally came around.

So am I, so am I. :)

556 posted on 07/19/2007 2:16:40 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

About my Carter vote. You’ll never know how much I hated that man before I even voted for him. I was proven right during his stay in the WH.


557 posted on 07/19/2007 2:19:14 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
Now I'm curious, explains what?

Dems seem more likely to fall for Corsi type scare mongering.

558 posted on 07/19/2007 2:25:05 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists, FairTaxers and goldbugs so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Maybe it's because we know where liberalism and leftism will lead you if you don't fight it.
559 posted on 07/19/2007 2:31:24 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I forgot to add. Not all dims were liberal. Many were conservative such as my family. We were democrat by birth and had been for generations. The new democrats have turned socialist, any in the middle have been squeezed out by the radicals.

Zell Miller ring a bell? He was our kind of democrat.

560 posted on 07/19/2007 2:43:46 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson