Protesters to converge on North America summit

World Net Daily ^ | June 20, 2007

[processing please hold]

Activists already are preparing to protest the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, a trilateral initiative between the U.S., Canada and Mexico seen by critics as a major step toward a North American Union, according to WND columnist Jerome Corsi, author of a new book on the subject, "The Late Great USA."

The meeting, which has received almost no mention in the U.S. mainstream media, is scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is scheduled to host the Quebec summit, which will be attended by Mexican President Felipe Calderon and President Bush.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Who agrees with communists? I’d say it was YOU.

But hedge, you're the one who agreed with CISPES, I disagreed. The entire world can click on the link in post #454. They can see you're a lying commie symp.

[hedgetrimmer]

They can see you're a lying commie symp.

That would be you. You support CAFTA-DR and the slave running Dominican Republican sugar cane growers. I don't. And you should tone down your rhetoric-- it does nothing to support your argument.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Okay comrade, post #454 shows you’re lying. LOLOL!!

[ovrtaxt]

Oh, look who came over to play! Wow Todd, is there anything about big government control freaks that you don’t like? First your sophomoric attempts to down the FairTax, now a denial fest! And 1rudeboy, the radical leftist troll who tries to stay under the radar.

Well, if you keep this up, the Mods may eventuially move this to the SBR, which is where you want it, right? Just like all the income tax defenders try to do with FairTax threads.

[1rudeboy]

Piss off.

[1rudeboy]

Have you ever seen one of these threads moved to SBR?

[ovrtaxt]

:) kissy kissy!

[1rudeboy]

Just out of curiousity, if I am truly a "radical leftist troll," why am I not making plans to go to Canada to protest the summit?

[sound of overtxt's skull imploding]

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wow Todd, is there anything about big government control freaks that you don’t like?

Sorry, I favor smaller government.

First your sophomoric attempts to down the FairTax

Math is hard for you, I'm sorry.

now a denial fest!

You're right, I deny the NAU exists.

Well, if you keep this up, the Mods may eventuially move this to the SBR, which is where you want it, right?

I don't care where (or if) they move your silliness. I'll just stop by occasionally to point out your stupidity.

Just like all the income tax defenders

Is that what you call people who don't fall for your phony numbers?

[ovrtaxt]

Since when is this a left vs. right thing? It’s not.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I don’t pay attention to the area these idiots postings are in, I just like to play whack the idiot.

[1rudeboy]

The Radical Left will be protesting this Summit in force. You called me a radical leftist. If it’s not a “left vs. right” thing, does that make me a pro-free-mark, supply side, Milton Friedman worshipping, radical leftist?

[1rudeboy]

What the heck sort of difference would it make if this thread was moved to SBR? Didn't we just get done with yesterday's crop of bunker-dwellers who were thanking us for bumping the thread? Is this an extended game of that's-not-what-I-argued-it's-what-I-was-arguing-anyway?

[Toddsterpatriot]

What the heck sort of difference would it make if this thread was moved to SBR?

It would prove "The Man was" keeping them down.

Didn't we just get done with yesterday's crop of bunker-dwellers who were thanking us for bumping the thread?

That's what we get for arguing with women.

Is this an extended game of that's-not-what-I-argued-it's-what-I-was-arguing-anyway?

I never said that.

[1rudeboy]

I was pondering the whole "thanks for bumping the thread" gambit. Assuming that (in most cases) it is a sort of oblique swipe at its recipient, in the sense that it is an exclamation along the lines of, "haha sucker, I'm getting you to bump an article with whose premise you disagree," isn't it also a tacit admission that the person making the statement deliberately avoids other threads, for fear of bumping them?

What kind of pathetic existence is that?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Bumping an idiot's thread 1000 times, if anything, just lets more people see that he (or lately she) is an idiot.

isn't it also a tacit admission that the person making the statement deliberately avoids other threads, for fear of bumping them?

They don't want to bump threads that prove them wrong.

[hedgetrimmer]

Okay comrade, post #454 shows you’re lying. LOLOL!!

You're projecting. Who's your comrade? ... see my tag line. Ha ha.

[hedgetrimmer]

Sorry, I favor smaller government.

Someone is fibbing... LOL! Our government has only exploded in size with the election of 3 "free trader" presidents and the creation of all those international institutions required to control it. LOLOLOL!

[hedgetrimmer]

What kind of pathetic existence is that?

An entirely amusing statement coming from someone named '1 rude boy'.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Who's your comrade?

Not you. You're a Commie liar, liar, liar.