Posted on 07/15/2007 12:11:18 PM PDT by processing please hold
Activists already are preparing to protest the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, a trilateral initiative between the U.S., Canada and Mexico seen by critics as a major step toward a North American Union, according to WND columnist Jerome Corsi, author of a new book on the subject, "The Late Great USA."
The meeting, which has received almost no mention in the U.S. mainstream media, is scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is scheduled to host the Quebec summit, which will be attended by Mexican President Felipe Calderon and President Bush.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
I am so sorry. Ignore that post. I was teaching my daughter how to post a picture, and that’s one of my favorites.
I used Corsi as an example of the argument you are attempting to make. I can just as easily say that my homepage contains links to "proof" the Easter Bunny exists. Why shouldn't you be sceptical?
Now, you know that's not true. Here's what I posted at #300, sans any argument, at all. It was to post #300 to which you decided to post about LABELS. That's what happens when you lie, you get caught.
Building a North American Community [pdf file]
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
More information at the conservative and respected Eagle Forum website.
So you haven’t been arguing the insidious nature of the SPP? Thanks for clearing that up.
No you didn’t. You continue to make spurious attacks against Corsi.
As usual.
Because you think if you can make this about Corsi, it will help you in your cause to discredit the existence of an NAU.
The SPP is insidious, and is a part of the furthering of the NAU.
Your tactics aren’t working shillboy.
Forget I mentioned Corsi, then. What about the evidence that the Easter Bunny exists?
So you are arguing the insidious nature of the SPP while not arguing the insidious nature of the SPP?
As I stated at least a hundred posts ago....grow up already.
Those were your words, to which you claim you had a right to post about clothing labels to me. The post I made had no argument at all. Nor did my post REVOLVE around the SPP, as you falsely claimed. The SPP website was INCLUDED with links to at least 5 other websites connected to the furthering the NAU, and links to the Eagle Forum website and the www.stopthenau.org website from which others could retrieve information.
You: So you are arguing the insidious nature of the SPP while not arguing the insidious nature of the SPP?
Try to keep up, okay?
I am trying to illustrate the rhetorical failure in your argument. One cannot claim A, post material that ostensibly supports A, and scream “grow up already” when someone points out that the material shows B. All the while refusing to provide specifics yet claiming that specifics are provided.
He didn't choose his screen name by accident.
You can’t even keep up.
Don’t try to give me a lecture on logic. Additionally, you have already been found lacking in honesty, integrity, and maturity already.
I have already surmised why.....sell-out for 30 pieces of silver.
ROTFLMAO
If you haven't noticed, nic is arguing that, in this case, he posted evidence of nothing and that he was just shooting the breeze.
*yawn&* Done playing with ya today.
Let’s try this: I quoted a section of a SPP document regarding standarized apparel-care labels, and you replied that you know all about tracking devices in clothing.
So you were either 1. implying that the SPP has something to do with tracking devices in clothing, or 2. changing the subject. Which was it?
They'll learn the hard way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.