Pretty good. The NAU doesn't exist, the SPP does.
what with that section your NWO Senate buddies snuck into S.1639
I have no NWO buddies, in the Senate or elsewhere.
Naw. You free-traitors are all about paying lower prices and letting the children down by destroying the American middle class.
Is that why unemployment was 6.5% before NAFTA and 4.5% now?
Free trade continues to be an illusion, promoted by well intentioned dolts who either don't know or don't care there is no level playing field.
So freer trade is bad? Cheaper foreign goods are bad?
Free here but, for God's sake, don't ask our foreign partners to eliminate all of the same trade barriers.
NAFTA and CAFTA didn't reduce some foreign barriers? If we reduce our tariffs 60% but foreigners only reduce their tariffs by 30%, that's bad for us?
Weak. The SPP begat the NAU proposal. The NAU proposal is about to be put forward by its promoters. Try again.
"I have no NWO buddies, in the Senate or elsewhere."
You just think you don't. Birds of a feather...
"Is that why unemployment was 6.5% before NAFTA and 4.5% now?"
Gee, then your unemployment stat ought to really drop after NAU is adopted, right? NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU--should be a real employment bonanza for the American middle class, right? Get real...
"So freer trade is bad? Cheaper foreign goods are bad?"
More dissembling. I'll take that as a "don't care that the playing field is not level" from you.
"NAFTA and CAFTA didn't reduce some foreign barriers? If we reduce our tariffs 60% but foreigners only reduce their tariffs by 30%, that's bad for us?"
Weak and unpersuasive. Your usual deflection won't level that playing field. Wish I could say "Nice try". It wasn't.