Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I forsee a war in space. Time for a United States Space Force.
1 posted on 06/29/2007 5:33:42 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wastedyears; dragonblustar; ssaftler; LucyT; Old Student; Shadowstrike; Paul Ross; RightWhale; ...

2 posted on 06/29/2007 5:34:14 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Mitt Romney 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

4 posted on 06/29/2007 5:44:13 PM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Ditto that.


5 posted on 06/29/2007 6:11:39 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Build the border fence and build it NOW!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

At six o’clock in the morning on January 12, 2007, a Chinese DF-21 missile launched from the Songlin test facility near Xichang, Sichuan, lifted a “kinetic kill vehicle” (KKV) into a near-space intercept trajectory for the orbit of a Chinese Fengyun 1-C weather satellite 500 miles above China. After it maneuvered to within a short distance of the weather satellite, the missile warhead fired the KKV, guided by illumination from a ground-based targeting laser, and, at 6:28 am, destroyed it.

Use of ground-based laser targeting could severely limit the usefulness of this technique, calling into question how many of these sophisticated trackers there are, and how many locations across the country might be needed.

Satellites in medium Earth orbit and geostationary orbit are not vulnerable to the direct-ascent ASAT system boosted by the two-stage DF–21 launcher. Although China has demonstrated the ability to launch satellites into geostationary orbits using larger rockets, the techniques required to reach higher orbits would significantly alter the dynamics for an effective hit-to-kill KKV, making the current ASAT design unusable for such purposes.
China is unlikely to be able to permanently disable most U.S. space assets in the near-term or midterm. The current U.S. trend towards employing constellations of small satellites, dispersing capabilities among a number of satellites, reduces the vulnerability to the loss of any single satellite and complicates efforts to target U.S. space capabilities. It also increases the robustness of the system by creating redundancies.


6 posted on 06/29/2007 7:22:29 PM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

I sure hope it doesn’t come to this...the consequences will be irreversible. You think the environmental nuts are bad now, just wait till we’re all dead because we’ve blocked out the sun from space debris. Okay it’s not that bad. But if we start blowing things up in LEO or GEO, forget about the ISS, the Shuttle, Ares/Orion, Soyuz, Shenzhou. It’s all down the tubes, no more space flight for generations. Those little shards stay in orbit for a LONG time and can cause TONS of damage. Think of something the size of a pebble traveling 18000mph. Game, set and match. Just neutralize their capability to do this in the first place and be done with it.


7 posted on 06/30/2007 12:22:26 AM PDT by AntiKev ("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis; Jeff Head

BTTT!


8 posted on 06/30/2007 1:45:04 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson