Interesting commentary about the special effects behind it.
I didn't realize that the blaster was modeled on real parts.
1 posted on
06/25/2007 1:01:44 PM PDT by
af_vet_rr
To: af_vet_rr; Tijeras_Slim
TTIUWP:
To: af_vet_rr
I purchased the directors cut a few years ago... it has some scenes that make it a lot more clear that Deckard is a replicant himself.
3 posted on
06/25/2007 1:06:36 PM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: af_vet_rr
4 posted on
06/25/2007 1:07:05 PM PDT by
SIDENET
(Inventor of the 12-hour "power nap".)
To: af_vet_rr; martin_fierro
To: af_vet_rr
Rrrowr.
7 posted on
06/25/2007 1:07:49 PM PDT by
martin_fierro
(I've done ... questionable things.)
To: af_vet_rr
To: af_vet_rr; Tijeras_Slim
It's the year 2007. Where are all the flying cars? There were supposed to be flying cars! Why? Why? WHY?
|
Toyota FINE-S concept car |
To: af_vet_rr
13 posted on
06/25/2007 1:36:45 PM PDT by
VOA
To: af_vet_rr
Ridley Scott is also behind the CBS TV show “Numbers” and occasionally has his characters make references to BladeRunner.
14 posted on
06/25/2007 1:55:53 PM PDT by
ikka
To: af_vet_rr
I suspect that “Blade Runner” was the first theatrical release in which
the term “reverse transcriptase” was uttered.
18 posted on
06/25/2007 4:31:58 PM PDT by
VOA
Deckard — Blade Runner, B26354.
Yes, I have watched it waaay too many times.
19 posted on
06/25/2007 9:50:51 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated June 23, 2007.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson