[nicmarlo]

nic: I claim A.
1rb: Prove A.
nic: Here, find it yourself.

If you’d READ what I posted, you wouldn’t make such a claim.

I linked EVERYTHING I posted to my comments...and stated why I made my claims.

As I said, get back to me when you feel like reading/posting comments based upon something other than you willful ignorance and empty opinions.

[1rudeboy]

We need to get one thing straight FRiend. I read your comment, I've read your comments, I probably read them the first time you posted them in '06, and I'm asking you to provide evidence of your Bush-globalist conspiracy. Giving me a link to the SPP's website doesn't cut it . . . you must apply your facts to your argument. The fact that you refuse to do so speaks volumes.

You did mention logical fallacies, so I'll add a comment about them here. I've given you three or four admitted results of the SPP agreement, that are not evidence of "conspiracy to form the NAU" (unless you argue otherwise--I'm waiting). That is standard rhetorical procedure when engaged in a logical argument. Just what exactly are you waiting for . . . you cannot shrug them off as my "opinion." So if you want a logical argument, get on with one.