Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The disconnect between movie critics who admire Roth's skill as a filmmaker and Roth himself is shown in these miles apart descriptions of the gore in Hostel Part II. From an Owen Gleiberman review of the movie in Entertainment Weekly (bold mine):

In the sado-perv fearfest that is Hostel: Part II, respectable businessmen from all over the world make bids, on their BlackBerries and office computers, to purchase a freshly abducted American college girl. The top bidder will travel to Slovakia, where, in a network of dungeons hidden behind the thick corroded walls of an abandoned factory, he'll torture and murder the victim he has bought. What's creepiest about this scenario is the way it mirrors the online auctions that have become big business in the sex-trafficking industry. Roth isn't just whipping up a blood-smeared megaplex hellhole. He's asking: In a world of global depravity, where anyone can buy anything, is homicide-for-kicks-for-the-right-price really such a huge leap?
But is that really what Roth is "asking"? Is he really "asking" anything? Not if you go by his brief interview with San Francisco Examiner's Rossiter Drake:

“A great horror scene trumps everything,” he says. “It doesn’t matter how much you spend on special effects, a great kill that makes audiences scream trumps all of that. I saw ‘Spider-Man 3,’ and people were asleep. It sucked. Now I can’t give you wall-to-wall blood — that would be boring — but when [a film] isn’t gory, it has to be creepy. If you are going to ‘Hostel: Part II,’ you’re going for that sense of dread, those scenes of intense violence, and you want more of them. And that’s what you get — the next level of depravity.”

Roth acknowledges that graphic violence is an important element in his filmmaking, but says it’s not the most important, skeptical critics to the contrary. He believes there will always be an audience for extreme horror, as long as there are storytellers committed to making smart, quality movies.

He says, “It used to be that directors made horror films as stepping stones to something else. We’ve got a wave of directors now — myself, Rob Zombie, James Wan, Darren Lynn Bousman — who love these movies, who are dedicated to making classics. There’s a perfect storm of horror right now. The studios want it. We want it. And the public is ready for it.”


FWIW: I went to last Saturday's sneak preview of Ratatouille and will post a review shortly.

1 posted on 06/18/2007 11:32:54 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: L.N. Smithee

Good morning..I’m skimming the headers..I read “NC-17”..say to myself..is that Heath Shuler’s district...?....


2 posted on 06/19/2007 5:50:08 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: L.N. Smithee

(A) What was the last movie to get an NC-17 rating and go theatrical release with that rating? (many R rated films are simply released as “unrated” on DVD).

(B) The American Library Association does not care what the MPAA rating is and supports loaning all films of all ratings to all patrons.


3 posted on 06/19/2007 2:29:27 PM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson