Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SubGeniusX

Good for him. But I respect Chan’s and Brunson’s bracelets more. They both have a bit of variety to their poker play and have won events other than No Limit Hold Em. Not to mention Chan’s back-to-back Main Event wins.

Now the race is on for them to tie Hellmuth. There’s lots of poker left.

BTW, this probably is a bit of a spoiler to people who were planning on watching the coverage.


3 posted on 06/15/2007 10:29:23 AM PDT by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: elc
Good for him. But I respect Chan’s and Brunson’s bracelets more. They both have a bit of variety to their poker play and have won events other than No Limit Hold Em. Not to mention Chan’s back-to-back Main Event wins.

I hear what you're saying, and there is no denying that Brunson is an all-time poker legend.

But the flip side to your argument is that Brunson won a lot of his bracelets back in the era when the events had around 20 people playing in them.

Now you certainly can't blame the guy for being old, but I'm not sure that a bracelet won back in '79 really has the same value as a bracelet won today in a NLH event with well over 1,000 players.

14 posted on 06/15/2007 7:43:13 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: elc
Not to mention Chan’s back-to-back Main Event wins.

And he was going for 3 in a row when he finished 2nd to Helmuth.

34 posted on 06/17/2007 7:24:28 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson