 |
"Clark, would LuthorCorp spend millions to turn guys gay? Although, you know, Clark, you and I haven't really sat down for dinner for a few seasons..." |
Posted on 06/09/2007 12:24:06 PM PDT by rface
A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.
Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."
Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.
As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."
The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.
"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.
"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.
The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.
"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.
However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.
"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."
Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.
Gay community leaders in California said Friday that they found the notion of a "gay bomb" both offensive and almost laughable at the same time.
"Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction," said Geoff Kors of Equality California. "So, it's just offensive that they think by turning people gay that the other military would be incapable of doing their job. And its absurd because there's so much medical data that shows that sexual orientation is immutable and cannot be changed."
Obviously San Francisco is where they tested this device.
Wow, first a firebomb, now a flamebomb...
...so do they drop them from a B-52 bummer?
/Moreford
I hate those convoluted breeder plots
I have a better theory... spray them with estrogen.
LOL! Whats next, a “conservative” bomb? Turns every right wing overnight?
“and make them more interested in sex than fighting.†............. Like the heterosexuals are now???
I prefer lethal weapons. Why let the enemy live to fight another day? Of course, collateral damage is less of a political weapon if you are just making interior decorators and exceptional florists out of the innocent. Then again, I would rather that somebody killed me outright than turn me into a queer.
Ah! Early in the first term of the Administration that gave us ‘don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. Some kind of Freudian Slip maybe. Naw, probably not.
Or the Enola Super Gay...
|
"Clark, would LuthorCorp spend millions to turn guys gay? Although, you know, Clark, you and I haven't really sat down for dinner for a few seasons..." |
And goats.
Been done.
Obviously it worked on these guys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.