They were. She got caught in a money scam and he got angry. She shoots him in the back and leaves him to die. End of story. That in itself is terrible, but then she lies on stand about his character. Not only did she take his life, she took his good name and he isn’t around to defend it. Her meanness goes deep to the bone.
I totally agree. What I don’t understand is why the prosecution let her get away with such a rediculous scenario without a more vigorous inquiry. They basically let her story go unchallenged.
She was fixing to get caught. I honestly believe she killed him to keep him from finding out what she had been doing. Thats even worse.
You are almost right, but he hadn’t found about the check kiting scheme, yet. The bank told Mary the day before she killed him that they wanted her and Matthew at the bank to discuss this matter. So he would have found out that day if she hadn’t killed him first. Which makes her even more of a cold blooded murder. He died innocent with the question “why, Mary” on his lips. Shes a disgusting excuse for a human being! God help those children if she gets them back.