Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 747 Dreamlifter Achieves FAA Certification
Boeing.com ^ | June 04, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 06/05/2007 9:13:31 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative

EVERETT, June 04, 2007 -- The Boeing Dreamlifter, the specially modified 747-400 used to transport the major assemblies of the all-new Boeing 787 Dreamliner, was granted type certification on Saturday, June 2, from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

The certification recognizes that the Dreamlifter has successfully passed all of the stringent testing and safety requirements required by the FAA. The Dreamlifter does not need to be certified by other regulatory agencies.

"This certification reflects not only the safety and reliability of the Dreamlifter but also its remarkable performance," said Scott Strode, 787 vice president of Airplane Definition and Production.

As part of the flight test program, FAA officials flew on board the Dreamlifter as it delivered major sections of the Dreamliner from partner sites around the world to the Boeing factory in Everett, Wash., for final assembly. The flights allowed the FAA to validate the overall delivery process and tools. The Dreamlifter is not certified to carry passengers beyond essential crew. The Dreamlifter completed 437 flight-test hours and 639 hours of ground testing since its first flight on Sept. 9, 2006.

With certification achieved, operation of the Dreamlifter fleet will soon be assumed by Evergreen International Airlines (EIA) of McMinnville, Ore. EIA must first complete the required New Airplane Process Document process proving it is ready to operate the aircraft. Boeing expects the transition to EIA to occur in June.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 787; aerospace; boeing; dreamlifter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: PAR35
I realized it had hinges. My point was there was no tail section attached to those hinges at the time the picture was taken.
61 posted on 06/05/2007 3:16:12 PM PDT by Shots (Loose lips sink ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Shots

The tail section is attached to the airframe in that picture. It’s just that the angle of the photograph has the payload covering up most of the tail section. If you look through the payload loader, you can just see the underside of the tail swung over 90 degrees to the fuselage.


62 posted on 06/05/2007 5:07:29 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Wow! Lots of information. You're either a Boeing insider, or one hell of an aerospace buff.

What major fuselage parts are made in the Dallas area? While Vought is headquartered there, ...

When I left Northrop Grumman in 1995, the 747 program had just come to an end. The group that I worked with was slated to be relocated to Vought in Dallas, but NG was also in the process of divesting itself of all commercial operations, Vought (presumably) being one. The relocation never took place, and I haven't kept up with NG's structure. Do you know if Vought still belongs to Northrop Grumman?

63 posted on 06/06/2007 6:26:04 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

In related news, Airbus placed on suicide watch.


64 posted on 06/06/2007 6:43:57 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LantzALot

I just read a lot of FR and remember what I’ve read, and have outstanding skills with the search engines.

The current Vought appears to be independent:

“Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. is an independent aerostructures company, under the ownership of The Carlyle Group since July 24, 2000.


65 posted on 06/06/2007 9:44:32 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Curiosity satisfied. Thanks.


66 posted on 06/06/2007 9:59:08 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The Buran. Never saw that pic.
Well...unil I just went to Google that is. :)


67 posted on 06/06/2007 11:51:51 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson