Art project mistaken for vandalism is vandalized

ASHLAND, Ore. (AP) - An art project that was mistaken for vandalism was the target of vandals who destroyed the exhibit last week.

The artist, Paul Messenger, said the piece was a commentary on society's apathy to its problems, but was left for interpretation by the viewer.

The exhibit in the Southern Oregon University art courtyard and art buildings consisted of 36,000 feet of red tape. It was titled "The Depravity of Society Juxtaposed Against the Apathy of Contemporary Culture" and scheduled to be shown through July 2 as a final project in an art course taught by professor Madeline Alt.

The red tape was meant to contrast with the grey stone of the buildings. "It's a very dull atmosphere, a very sterile environment," Messenger said.

Police cited an SOU sophomore, Genevieve Hummel, 19, for tearing the installation down, and the university art department is pressing charges.

"I didn't know it was an art project," Hummel said. "It wasn't labeled. No one knew it was an art project."

Hummel said other people were tearing the art installation down and she was cleaning it up when art professor Cody Bustamante confronted them.

"I was just picking up what people had made messy," Hummel said. "Everyone else split."

Bustamante brought her into his office where the two began to argue. Ashland police were called.

Hummel was accused of 11 different conduct and student responsibility charges. She also is being charged with criminal mischief. The SOU art department is seeking $83.39 for six hours of labor and the supplies required to replace the installation.

Messenger said he talked with Hummel and worked out their own differences. Messenger chose not to press personal charges, saying, "That's one of the risks of public art."

Messenger, 24, is a graduating senior who is working with an art therapy group at Rogue Valley Youth Correctional Facility and plans on entering SOU's master's in teaching program.

"The piece will be re-assembled," Messenger said. "Third time's the charm I guess." (Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.) (Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

Where do I start with this idiocy?

An art project that was mistaken for vandalism was the target of vandals who destroyed the exhibit last week.
The exhibit in the Southern Oregon University art courtyard and art buildings consisted of 36,000 feet of red tape.

People tried to clean up a bunch of trash around their campus were "vandals"?

The artist, Paul Messenger, said the piece was a commentary on society's apathy to its problems, but was left for interpretation by the viewer.

Guess that didn't work so well, did it? Apparently the apathetic populace cleaned up that piece of crap you called "art". I also love how these artistes always claim that their work is open for interpretation, when the truth is that it makes no sense at all.

"I was just picking up what people had made messy," Hummel said. "Everyone else split."
Hummel was accused of 11 different conduct and student responsibility charges. She also is being charged with criminal mischief. The SOU art department is seeking $83.39 for six hours of labor and the supplies required to replace the installation.

Need I even comment on the absurdity and unfairness of this?

Messenger, 24, is a graduating senior who is working with an art therapy group at Rogue Valley Youth Correctional Facility and plans on entering SOU's master's in teaching program.

Don't even get me started on the uselessness of this degree.

So what the problem? According to the article...

“but was left for interpretation by the viewer.”

But when it was interpreted they got offended?

Fools.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.