They're certainly easy on the eyes...
To: Rutles4Ever
"Eat your Maypo, sweetie. Just think of all the starving children in India..."
Who'da thunk it?
2 posted on
06/01/2007 8:58:37 AM PDT by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: Rutles4Ever
"If by perseverance, the snail could reach the Ark, why can't these worthy ladies stand on and turn the scale."I think this line lost something in the trnaslation.
3 posted on
06/01/2007 8:58:51 AM PDT by
blau993
To: Rutles4Ever
I agree with this policy, the only thing worse than getting hit by the beverage cart is getting side swiped by a fat stewardess - I mean flight attendant.
To: Rutles4Ever
If safety doesn’t get them to slim down, how about a carbon surcharge? Make them buy carbon credits for all the extra co2 generated hauling the excess baggage around the friendly skies.
5 posted on
06/01/2007 9:03:09 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Thompson in 2008 - there is no doubt about it! [GWB has jumped the duck])
To: Rutles4Ever
the last couple of times I’ve flown Delta internationally, the term “wide-body” didn’t only apply to the aircraft..every one, and I mean every one of the flight attendants were “waistline challenged”. they were surly, impatient and obnoxious..I switched to United. Much friendlier and better food IMHO..
8 posted on
06/01/2007 9:11:17 AM PDT by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Every Democrat Party cause eventually becomes a business then it degenerates into a racket.)
To: Rutles4Ever
Nice 1950's Denny's uniforms too.
10 posted on
06/01/2007 9:20:00 AM PDT by
Millee
(Tagline free since 10/20/06)
To: Rutles4Ever
Funny, you don’t see too many overweight Indian chicks.
11 posted on
06/01/2007 9:20:30 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: Rutles4Ever
They need to enforce this in the US as well. Between the porky stewardesses and the poofers, flying has become much less pleasant.
13 posted on
06/01/2007 9:25:58 AM PDT by
pissant
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson