Skip to comments.
Mom, 20, giving birth to third set of twins
WFAA.com ^
| Thursday, May 31, 2007
| BRAD WATSON
Posted on 06/01/2007 3:05:30 AM PDT by Daffynition
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
There are no words ... except tubal ligation.
To: rainbow sprinkles
The father of the latest set of twins
Josh's dating scene must really suck.
2
posted on
06/01/2007 3:15:55 AM PDT
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: rainbow sprinkles
This is disgusting! Sometimes I wish that you had to get a linsence to have children AND then you had to be no younger than 25. It is appauling that these losers are bringing in six children into this world at age 20 with no prospects of caring for them financially. Even people who are twenty having their first children are not mature enough to handle it. My wife and I were 29 when we had our first after seven years of marriage. Now that is a perfect scenario. We have three now and we never worry about where the next meal comes, did not even qualify for WIC. Why more folks don’t think like we do is sad.
To: rainbow sprinkles
What does she have a fertility IV continully dripping into her?
To: rainbow sprinkles; Lijahsbubbe; aculeus; dighton; martin_fierro
The father of the latest set of twins hopes he's ready. Should we leap to the conclusion that he fathered both of them? I think that's quite a stretch!
To: rainbow sprinkles
four-year-old Natalie, three-year-old twins Adam and Sebastian and two-year-old twins Rachel and RaquelCount 'em - that is SEVEN kids being raised by these parasites on society, once the last set is born.
6
posted on
06/01/2007 3:46:29 AM PDT
by
ikka
To: napscoordinator
7 - don’t forget the oldest daughter.
Welfare - the only way to raise your kids.
Hey, wait, that’s my money I could be spending on my kids. Oh, yeah, that’s why I only had three. I couldn’t afford any more.
7
posted on
06/01/2007 3:58:57 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: rainbow sprinkles
"But with neither the 21-year-old father nor the 20-year-old mother employed - all the children are supported by welfare - the young family faces financial and emotional obstacles. " America the beautiful. Pretty soon, everyone will just quit working.
8
posted on
06/01/2007 4:05:07 AM PDT
by
blam
To: rainbow sprinkles
9
posted on
06/01/2007 4:16:30 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: rainbow sprinkles
This is great. My tax dollars at work supporting deadbeats. I seen a couple of weeks ago where 56% of the US population receives some sort of governement assistance. I guess that’s why I have to keep working.
10
posted on
06/01/2007 4:24:57 AM PDT
by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: Thrownatbirth; napscoordinator; AmericaUnited; Thinkin' Gal; ikka; blam; ken5050; caver
I’m thinkin’ ...anchor babies here.
11
posted on
06/01/2007 5:04:57 AM PDT
by
Daffynition
(A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking.)
To: ikka
Count 'em - that is SEVEN kids being raised by these parasites on society, once the last set is born.And at 20, she hasn't even got started good. Just wait another 20 years and she'll have a few dozen grandchildren on the dole as well.
12
posted on
06/01/2007 5:23:33 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: AmericaUnited
My second cousin whose father was an identical twin gave birth to three sets of identical twins. It is a very rare club. The gene is passed on I guess according to her doctors. After her third set, she had a tubal ligation at age 27.
For the record, she is married and all babies had the same EMPLOYED father.
13
posted on
06/01/2007 6:18:16 AM PDT
by
poobear
(Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
To: napscoordinator
SEVEN. There’s a 4 year old. All 9 of them supported by the taxpayers. And since she’s only 20, how much you want to bet there’s more to come?
14
posted on
06/01/2007 6:35:08 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: caver
Well how else can they maintain the lifestyle to which they’ve become accustomed?
ENTITLEMENT ya know.
15
posted on
06/01/2007 6:37:38 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: napscoordinator
16
posted on
06/01/2007 6:43:24 AM PDT
by
buck61
To: Sue Perkick
Hey, and the more you have, the fatter your gift from the taxpayers. For this couple, a welfare check is their baby shower that never ends.
To: ken5050
When is she getting neutered?
18
posted on
06/01/2007 6:48:00 AM PDT
by
angcat
("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
It’s true. The more they have the more they get rewarded for it. Bigger check. More food stamps. Bigger house. Medical. All free of charge. But only for them. I don’t see how this country can keep going at the pace these parasites are multiplying. We’re all over taxed as it is. Something’s got to give.
19
posted on
06/01/2007 6:56:53 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: mtbopfuyn
My wife is a high school teacher, she had a girl a few years back who was pregnant with her third kid.
20
posted on
06/01/2007 6:57:06 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
(Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson