Which you did not link of course, and now I see why. Not only was the quote from 2004, you left off the quotation marks and added your own commentary inluding the word Microsoft to make it look like they were recent and actually came from the CEO when it was actually just you posing as him! LMAO! Typical BS from you, there's no level to which you won't stoop to support leftist freaks like Stallman.
The post was made after the 2004 Sun/Microsoft patent agreement when people thought Sun had left OpenOffice out to dry since it isn't included in the agreement.
Get your timelines straight before you criticize, or you just end up looking dumb.
you left off the quotation marks and added your own commentary inluding the word Microsoft to make it look like they were recent and actually came from the CEO when it was actually just you posing as him!
Uh, no. Quit your unfounded accusations.
First, notice that I was careful to be honest in that posting, even adding [my emphasis] to the bold text.
Second, yet another lesson for the clueless: There's this little tag in HTML called "blockquote." See the word "quote" in there? I thought so. It's meant so that those who know HTML can block-off a quote. It indents everything between the tags so that those who are used to reading HTML-formatted text know it's a quote.
Now notice that my mention of Microsoft is outside of the blockquote! View the source of that post if you know how and verify it. No rational person could have though I did what you said, but then nobody here thinks you are rational.
Retract your unfounded, libelous personal attack and apologize -- honestly, not politician style. And then don't do it again.