[The Iceman Cometh]

was found innocent in 1995 of killing his ex-wife

Not being anal, but wasn't he found 'not guilty'?

I thought there was a legal difference.

[kellynla]

was found innocent in 1995 of killing his ex-wife
Not being anal, but wasn’t he found ‘not guilty’?

I thought there was a legal difference.

well I am not a lawyer...I work for a living but on “Law & Order” you’re either “guilty” or “not guilty”

and OJ was found “not guilty” in criminal court and “guilty” in the civil court lawsuit...fwiw....

[kellynla]

“was found innocent in 1995 of killing his ex-wife”

and of course those of us who don’t believe in being in two places at the same time...his wife’s blood on his socks found in his bedroom was all the evidence needed to convict!

can you say “jury nullification”

[oblomov]

>I thought there was a legal difference.

There is, and there is a moral difference as well.