Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
What's really frightening here is that some FReepers might take your "reading" as settled law. Your read is so far off-base that the following is required.

Important Notice to all. Please do not depend on posting from non-lawyers here as legal advice. Following the counsel of certain posters WHO ARE NOT LAWYERS AND WHOSE READING OF LAW IS AT BEST "EXTRA-ORDINARY" could result in severe legal difficulties.

As a matter of course, you should never use any published materiel as legal advice and only accept legal advice from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who is familiar with both the law ands the circumstances of your case. NOTHING POSTED BY ME IS TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. (Adapted from the ABA position on publishing in legal matters.)

To all, sorry the above is needed, but after tpaine post, it is.

To tpaine. You are beyond foolish. You are dangerous to FR and The Conservative Movement. I will not reply to any of your further posts. I do not debate fools. It only encourages them.

66 posted on 05/07/2007 6:46:05 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: y'all
My case has been made by my opponent.
67 posted on 05/07/2007 7:08:33 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
You are correct about "Tpaine". He often thinks he understands the law, but I think he doesn't even understand English. BUT, even a broken clock can be correct twice a day.

There are four elements to proving an 18 USC 242 violation:

1. The victim must have been an inhabitant of a State, District or Territory of the United States;

2. The accused must have been acting under color of law;

3. The conduct of the accused must have deprived the victim of a right, privilege or immunity secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States;

4. The defendant must have acted willfully.

Here are two quick cases to look at:

United States v. Senak, 477 F.2d 304, 306 (7th Cir. 1973).
United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 264 (1997)

68 posted on 05/12/2007 12:06:33 PM PDT by ipwnedu50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States,

[b]or[/b] to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

69 posted on 05/12/2007 12:10:28 PM PDT by ipwnedu50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
If you would like to see some stupidity by "tpain", I invite you to look at this thread:

_________________________________________

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1774791/posts

70 posted on 05/12/2007 12:13:14 PM PDT by ipwnedu50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson