Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Curiosity question. Does anyone know how the abort rockets on the Mercury through Apollo rockets were dealt with after the critical point was past? It seems like a lot of wasted payload to haul into orbit.


3 posted on 04/21/2007 3:19:14 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

They weren’t wasted payloads except in retrospect. They were a safety feature. The Apollo escape rockets were blown away after first staging. Not sure Mercury had ‘em, pretty sure the first two Mercury launches didn’t have ‘em.


4 posted on 04/21/2007 4:11:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 18, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

http://www.astronautix.com/craft/csmles.htm

1962 April 6

• Thiokol selected for Apollo launch escape tower jettison motors

The Thiokol Chemical Corporation was selected by NAA to build the solid-fuel rocket motor to be used to jettison the Apollo launch escape tower following a launch abort or during a normal mission.


5 posted on 04/21/2007 4:13:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 18, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson