Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Preacher's Wife On Stand For Murder: He Forced Me To Have Sex, Refused Divorce
FOX ^ | 04/18/07 | Unknown

Posted on 04/18/2007 10:36:54 AM PDT by Froufrou

A preacher's wife accused of murdering her husband testified Wednesday that she doesn't remember picking up the shotgun or pointing it at her husband, but she said she did not pull the trigger. She heard a "boom" as the shotgun fired, she said.

"Something went off," Mary Winkler said, crying on the witness stand.

She said she just wanted to talk to her husband, Matthew, when she went into their bedroom, but she was terrified. Her husband was physically and sexually abusive, she said. That day, she said, she just wanted to stop him from being so mean.

Her depiction of her marriage contrasts radically from the description by the prosecution, whose witnesses described Matthew Winkler as a good father and husband.

Matthew Winkler, 31, was found fatally shot in the parsonage where the family lived in March 2006. A day later, his wife was arrested on the Alabama coast 340 miles away, driving the family minivan with her three young daughters inside.

Earlier Wednesday, Mary Winkler testified her husband punched and kicked her, forced her to have sex she considered unnatural and refused to grant her a divorce.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: blamethedeadguy; christians; familyvalues; marywinkler; winkler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Zionist Conspirator
It seems as if the wife is:

(1) Slandering her dead husband and inventing vicious stories about him that play into the Lifetime MovieChannel/Hollywood picture of Bible-believing preachers.

(2) Taking advantage of the Scripture-based forgiveness and concern that her husband's congregation extended to her after she committed this vile crime.

It underscores precisely the cultural trap that has been set for fundamental Christians according to your analysis.

41 posted on 04/19/2007 7:06:46 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
The argument that the defense will make is simple and predictable:

(1) Mary Winkler grew up in a strict Christian household, where she was taught that the husband has total authority over the wife and that questioning this authority is sinful.

(2) This same upbringing instilled in her the notion that divorce is evil, that it brings shame and humiliation on one's entire family and that seeking a divorce is an admission that one is a complete moral and spiritual failure.

(3) She had great trauma as a child when her sister died and never sought the help of a professional. For this reason she had terrible feelings of inadequacy and depression that tortured her and were left untreated.

(4) Her husband was abusive - mentally, physically and sexually and took delight in dominating and humiliating her. She could not conceive of leaving him because of the repressive cultural milieu in which she was raised. In her world, divorce was unthinkable, so she had to endure the abuse.

(5) In order to please her husband she hit upon a scheme to bring extra money into the household. She hoped that this would please her husband and temper his abusiveness.

(6) She wasn't thinking clearly because of her undiagnosed mental and emotional trauma, and was drawn into a scam that lost the family's savings and put them in a bad legal position.

(7) The scam may even have been her husband's idea and he may have forced her into it - and she went along wanting to please him and stop his abuse.

(8) When the scam went sour, her husband went ballistic. Crazed with fear and anticipating that the abuse would get worse, her mental and emotional problems overwhelmed her, her mind snapped, and in a moment of temporary insanity she killed her husband.

This line of reasoning has won juries over before and may again.

42 posted on 04/19/2007 7:20:38 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Biblical Fundamentalists do indeed often find themselves in a lose/lose situation, and now that you mention it I can indeed see a TV movie being made about this affair.

What went on behind closed doors is something that I know nothing about and is indeed theoretically possible that the woman was severely abused (I'm not following the trial). However, even if she is the victim in this case (again, a theoretical possiblity I am in no position to judge) we may be sure that Biblical Fundamentalism will be indicted as a whole, despite the fact that the vast majority of Fundamentalist marriages and families seem to be happy and well-adjusted.

43 posted on 04/19/2007 7:26:58 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Please pray for the refu'ah shelemah of Yehudah Ben Rivqah, father of Binyamin Jolkovsky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Are you a lawyer? If not, you sure could be!

[no offense!]


44 posted on 04/19/2007 7:41:47 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

My wife is the attorney in the family. But I contemplated the bar back in my younger days before deciding against it.


45 posted on 04/19/2007 7:50:55 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I did too. I even took and passed the LSAT. That’s as far as it got.


46 posted on 04/19/2007 8:02:49 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson