Where do you get your info? In what state was this decided? As you may or may not know the SCOTUS decided,less than a year ago,to uphold a ruling by a Federal Court judge that ANS was entitles to $88 million.
The way I read the explanation is that the SCOTUS has,in effect,decided that Federal courts have the power to get involved in state Probate Court actions.
Is the jury decision to which you refer in keeping with this unanimous Supreme Court decision?
The jury trial determined that Marshall’s ONLY WILL named his son Pierce is sole heir. The testimony that ANS gave that her husband “intended” to take care of her for life was not belived by the jury. That is settled. Any other ruling has to take that into consideration.
I have heard and read from several sources that Anna Nicole turned down the 88 million settlement. And ended up with nothing. Crazy of her if this is true - which it well might not be. She had the right to refile, but now is dead. The other day one lawyer stated that the chances of the baby getting anything is practically zero. But who knows!