I believe I did read Sen. Inhofe’s speeches on the subject.
I didn’t sign up here until 2000, but I’ve lurked since Jan. 22, 1998...
the day my granddaughter was born, and CNN broke the Monica story.
It’s been a while, so I will have to go back and read them again.
I totally agree with you WRT the importance of this subject, and the implications.
Pinging someone just because they posted is a no-no.
When you ping those who you know want to be on the ping list, as I do,
that’s okay...just don’t ping anyone who has not said they want to be on.
Ask first...
Yes, I know. And after you've reviewed the Inhofe speeches, you might find yourself awash with worries about Hillary getting back into the White House.
"Pinging someone just because they posted is a no-no."
That's what I never gave much thought to, but now I will.
Unfortunately, my chinagate ping list just went from over 200 - - down to about eight or nine. Over the past many years since the Inhofe speeches, I never differentiated between who posted frequently to chinagate threads or just posted a few words; and I've also never tried to differentiate those who left fr and those who remain.
Anyway, hopefully, chinagate will be a bit more important then what it seems here now - especially with Hillary bangin' at the White House door again.
Google: Clinton National Security Scandal and Coverup