Your arguments are not persuasive. By nominating a liberal to the Republican ticket, the GOP is abandoning me and does not deserve my support. In effect, the Republican party will shoot itself in the foot, and that is not my fault, but a fault of both the RNC and the country as a whole moving to the left.
I want no part of it, and reject the blame that is being laid at my feet when that blame lies at the feet of those who run the RNC, IMO.
When given the choice of liberal A and liberal B, I choose none of the above as either being elected makes no difference to me.
Fine. But understand that by doing so, you are helping to elect the D.
P.S.
It is disingenuous to call Giuliani a liberal.
Yes, he is socially liberal in most ways (but not all-recall the Bklyn museum-Jesus imbroglio); but he is fiscally conservative. he is conservative on fighting crime. (And he has been highly successful in both areas. It’s one thing to have a certain ideological bent. It is quite another to successfully implement it.)
But perhaps most important of all, on prosecuting the war on terror he is conservative. And he will protect the constitution from activist judges. That is to say, on the crucial issues of our time, Giuliani is conservative. What more could you want?
At the momemt who is better at prosecuting criminals, defending our country against Islamofacists, reducing taxes, etc, etc. Check his record. All those “liberal” things are minor as he has little control. Go after DEMOCRATS. Let’s not eat our own. I’ll be voting for ANYONE who is the Republican nominee and that person will FAR SURPASS a Marxist/Socialist Clintonista/Obama Osama Hussein.
At the momemt who is better at prosecuting criminals, defending our country against Islamofacists, reducing taxes, etc, etc. Check his record. All those “liberal” things are minor as he has little control. Go after DEMOCRATS. Let’s not eat our own. I’ll be voting for ANYONE who is the Republican nominee and that person will FAR SURPASS a Marxist/Socialist Clintonista/Obama Osama Hussein.