The Perot analogy is absurd. I will vote for just about any Republican I’ve seen join the race at this point except for the liberal because of his track record.
This also has nothing to do with ‘Doctrinal Purity’, but with my own personal convictions and conscience. You may be prepared to allow liberal RINO Rudy to sign any gun grabbing legislation that the dim led congress hands him just to keep hitlery out of the White House, but I am not prepared to sacrifice my rights so readily. If both are going to threaten the right I hold dearest of all, why bother voting for either? That doesn’t even include the appointment of Supreme Court judges that also directly affect me personally, but I see no difference between the two in these aspects.
In the end, both are detrimental to our society, one immediately, one over the long haul. You can have them. I want nothing to do with either.
You are distorting the facts.
For example, Rudy says he will appoint strict constructionists to the court. We know hillary will appoint activist judges.
This is huge. This is, arguably, the whole ball of wax. This determines whether the Constitution is protected or not.
And this difference punctures virtually all of your objections.
Your distortions may help you deal with your ‘conscience,’ but that doesn’t make your action to help elect hillary clinton any less immoral.
The Perot analogy is absurd. I will vote for just about any Republican I’ve seen join the race at this point except for the liberal because of his track record.
The Perot analogy applies to the hypothetical Rudy v hillary matchup.
And it is exactly apt.
The clintons are playing the Religious Right like fiddles.
The irony of the clintons manipulating the RR to help to elect hillary clinton must not be lost in this obsession with Rudy.
The real danger to the RR isn't Rudy. It's the clintons.
WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS
AFTERWORD: A Note to the Religious Right