To: Oberon
I think Lee was a brilliant tactician and Longstreet's problems (of which he had many) hindered Lee more than it helped. I don't think, when Longstreet was separated from Lee, he proved that he was not as good as he thought he was.
But, I like Longstreet. After all, he's Old Pete.
I am Jackson fan first and foremost. And who does not love Jeb Stuart? Besides Sheridan. I admire Lee's character.
250 posted on
04/09/2007 8:56:19 AM PDT by
carton253
(Not enough space to express how I truly feel.)
To: carton253
I think Lee was a brilliant tactician and Longstreet's problems (of which he had many) hindered Lee more than it helped. I don't think, when Longstreet was separated from Lee, he proved that he was as good as he thought he was.
Proofread, proofread, proofread.
251 posted on
04/09/2007 8:57:47 AM PDT by
carton253
(Not enough space to express how I truly feel.)
To: carton253
Dang...I was two paragraphs into a reply before I realized I was committing a thread hijacking.
"Writing," he told himself furiously, "...this thread is about writing!"
The war appears to be a study of the choice between losing nobly and winning ugly. That choice is the source of endless debate, none of which is appropriate to this thread. I confess, by way of conclusion, that I too admire men like Jackson. He was arguably the William Wallace of his cause, a man utterly devoted to victory and unafraid of death.
It is well that he was unafraid, for death certainly found him.
254 posted on
04/09/2007 9:09:50 AM PDT by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson