Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: carton253
First, back to the show and not tell. Maybe I am an anomaly - but I would read a "tell" if it was written well. Margaret Mitchell in Gone With The Wind writes pages of tell interspersed with show when she is writing the biographies of Gerald and Ellen O'Hara. At fourteen, when I first read the book, I had no problem reading it. (In fact, it came in handy when I critiqued my prof's article for a journal and told him he was wrong on a Gerald fact. He didn't believe me, so he handed me a copy of GWTW and I found the quote in a few minutes)

I think many if not most here will agree that the really important rule is that rules can be broken. Rules can be broken, you just have to be good enough to carry it off. Every rule they give you about writing can be broken in a certain situation.

That said, the rules define craftsmanship and excellence. So learn the rules, use them, and you’ll then be able to break them to good effect.

Thus, showing is better than telling, usually. But not always.

Present tense is better than past tense, usually. But not always.

“Blah blah blah,” she said is better than “Blah blah blah,” she breathed, usually. And so on.

234 posted on 04/03/2007 8:23:36 AM PDT by Scourge of God (Remember, liberals, 'baaa' means NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Scourge of God

The secret is that you have to be good enough to carry it off.


235 posted on 04/03/2007 8:57:02 AM PDT by carton253 (Not enough space to express how I truly feel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Scourge of God
But times change. At fourteen, I read Margaret Mitchell's background and was not bored at all.

Fast forward almost thirty years to a fourteen year I knew who almost threw the book down because of the background. Where was the action? Why was this included? Was it necessary?

Probably not. But when I asked her what the rush was she said that she just didn't see the need for this "stuff".

I got to participate in a fascinating discussion on whether books are dying out because of TV, movies, and things like graphic comics. That the thought of sitting down with a book on a rainy afternoon was becoming a think of the past and soon...books would go the way of the horse and buggy. People do not want to invest the time and energy of reading a book.

I said I do not believe so because people will always need heros, but of the 15 people in the room, I was the only one who thought the "novel" was not on the endangered species list.

236 posted on 04/03/2007 9:05:31 AM PDT by carton253 (Not enough space to express how I truly feel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson