"I was told I needed to infuse my knowledge, findings, and interpretations into the book. What the person suggested was that I step out of the narrative and add my insights. But, am I not doing that by changing history and having the narrative continue? Everything that happens after the 18th North Carolina misses is based on my knowledge, findings (lots of research went into the story) and intepretations.
Can't I have the characters do that for me. Speak my findings and interpretations? "
That's how you should do it. Don't tell them what you know. Show it. Use your insights to make your characters come to life. I have previously mentioned the Clunking One, Harry Turtledove, who invented alternative history. Read a bit of his civil war writings, and if you aren't screaming at the written page, "not like that, you idiot! Stonewall Jackson would never have said anything like that!", check to see if you're still breathing. He's a great starting point, because while he's an expert historian, he's a horrible, horrible writer. That's why I read him.
I know that people are busy with their every day lives and sometimes do not have time to visit this thread. But, I am going to do what I can to see this thread stays visible and useful.
So, ping to the top.
If you’re going to tell the soldier’s story, you’ve got to wear his bloody shirt; and when you leave him on the ground you must linger long enough to consecrate his journey.