Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CondorFlight

Nifong should be forced to resign if he won't do it voluntarily.


2 posted on 03/19/2007 2:51:19 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganwuzthebest
Nifong should be forced to resign if he won't do it voluntarily.

I agree. It's the seriousness of the charge that counts.

13 posted on 03/19/2007 2:58:04 PM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

He needs prison time.


16 posted on 03/19/2007 3:02:41 PM PDT by CAWats (People that are easily angered are easily frightened.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

The NC Bar wants more than his resignation. They want his bar membership yanked permanently, so that he can't practice law in the state at all, and would be very unlikely to get admitted to any other state's bar.


17 posted on 03/19/2007 3:05:09 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Nifong should be forced to resign if he won't do it voluntarily.

Not good enough. He should be disbarred, all charges against the players dropped, and for good measure he should be responsible for all legal expenses the players and their families encountered.

30 posted on 03/19/2007 3:14:22 PM PDT by barker ( A smile is a curved line that sets things straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

It's past time for him to go AND BE DISBARRED!!!


36 posted on 03/19/2007 3:26:56 PM PDT by no dems (Herman Cain for VEEP in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Nifong should be forced to resign if he won't do it voluntarily.

He's not gonna resign, and if I understand the rules correctly, the only person who can remove him is the judge of the Superior Court.

Unfortunately, that person is one of his buddies and is protecting him, refusing to act on a petition for his removal filed a while back until after the bar proceedings. The law required him to act on the petition within 30 days. He claims that issuing a stay that will be in effect for a good six months met the definintion of "acting."

Hard to believe that is what the legislature intended ...

54 posted on 03/19/2007 7:36:38 PM PDT by freespirited (Resentment, redistribution, and re-education. The three Rs of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson