More lies as expected, when in fact you've been contending for years that IBM's only contribution were the original servers donated prior to Jokelaw's existence, while the facts show the contributions are quote "ongoing". Trying to claim none of the commentary from the "leftist loon" website was ever posted here is another ridiculous lie as well, but another perfect example of the BS you're known for.
Good point, that contributions are ongoing is new information. Red Hat signed on to years of contribution in the beginning, and I guess IBM did, too.
It still changes nothing. IBM donates to UNCH. IBM donates to hundreds of universities, as does Microsoft.
Trying to claim none of the commentary from the "leftist loon" website was ever posted here
That was never claimed. What is claimed is that we do not rely on the commentary for debate. It's the court documents that win our debates because SCO is losing and the facts in the documents represent that. You and SCO don't like that being made public and easily accessible, so you do the only thing you can do -- attempt personal attacks.
However, the commentary has sometimes been useful. Did you know what the judge meant when he said "That Proctor & Gamble case brings back so many happy memories."? I didn't, until the commentary pointed it out.