Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26; abb

The article is also slanted in that the report either does not understand or is hiding that Roberts [aka Pittman] is not cooperating because she is holding out for immunity. Whether she stole Mangum's money that night or not, she has to hold out for immunity because she does not know if the new prosecutors will indict her for grand theft or not.

And of course Mangum has NEVER cooperated in this case. She only picked four players in her 3rd or more photo line up. As someone on this board, Jezzebelle maybe, once said Mangum was going to ID three lacrosse players if Nifong had to cut her finger off and point it at them himself.

BTW, this Foxnew.com article on the Pressler and Yeager book on this hoax hints good news is coming for the good guys:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258969,00.html

From the article: "Yaeger also said that there could be some information coming from the special prosecutors now investigating the case "very soon." That information "would be really wonderful news for all the people involved,""


38 posted on 03/16/2007 5:04:54 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

From the coach in the Foxnews piece --

" We remained silent for that period of time because we believed in those two words: the truth. There was no reason to debate that publicly. We were going to stand by it, stay the course "


So that's why you quit your job and bugged out, coach? What a wuss. What a fracking wuss. And since you weren't at the party that night, you know nothing. But here's your fifteen minutes of shame for deserting the team.


55 posted on 03/17/2007 9:48:15 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson