If you want a better one, go to where he said Stallman opposes patents, meaning all patents. After countered with the truth (against software patents only), he continued on this line and even called me deceitful for correcting him, and never apolgized. In a later thread he quietly switched to saying "software patents," but never admitted his lie.
Or what about claiming that a FReeper supported sending people to a hacker site to get OS updates, when all GE was pointed to was a flash animation of an update that showed how easy it is?
Or when he accused FD of saying Dell ships Linux for desktops, couldn't back it up, and eventually pointed to one of his own posts as a post FD made saying it.
Or how about when he was libeling Halfmanhalfamazing, saying he was a Stallman-supporting zealot looking for "recruits" for the "cause" and pointing to his supposedly Stallman-loving posts somewhere else, where Halfmanhalfamazing was actually seriously ripping against Stallman on that board ("Stallman is a whackjob. Every time he speaks it's diarrhea of the mouth.").
Oh, and what about saying Linus Torvalds did a 180 on his views of the GPL3, despite that Torvalds maintained that the draft was absolutely unacceptable?
It would probably take days to research all of his lies, especially when he takes another FReeper's post out of context in order to commit libel.
True of course. FYI his name is Shuttleworth.
After countered with the truth (against software patents only)
You've been defending that leftist moonbat endlessly of course, but never linked anything to back you up on this, ever, just typical antiRepublican BS.
what about claiming that a FReeper supported sending people to a hacker site to get OS updates
N3WBI3 has admitted he's a hacker, and has obvious hacker symbology in his name, so his site is a hacker site by definition.
when he accused FD of saying Dell ships Linux for desktops
There's been countless threads claiming this, all lies of course, Dell still isn't shippiong Linux on home computers LMAO.
when he was libeling Halfmanhalfamazing, saying he was a Stallman-supporting zealot
Well here he is on this very thread claiming there's more holes in Vista when the facts show 200+ to 3 in favor of Vista LOL.
Torvalds maintained that the draft was absolutely unacceptable?
No he hasn't, you're wrong on the facts again of course, but what we expect from liberal phonies. Pinging your hell hound now too I see LMAO.
This is unbelievable how deceitful this is, and will be my last post to this thread. Look at antiRepublican's post, #51.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1800469/posts?page=51#51
He said quote "go to where he said Stallman opposes patents, MEANING ALL PATENTS." This was linked to the following post of mine:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=214#214
Where I clearly said "software patents". My comment was qoute "fighting them is one of his core philosophies. Quote from his website "Every software patent is harmful"."
How much bigger a liar could he get? No telling, but I could really care less LMAO. GE OUT.