Read the post.
To your first claim that it's about Linux: no mention of Linux or free software anywhere in that post.
To your second claim: it's about a company suing a legitimate university computer researcher for doing a report on their DRM. That's an abuse of copyright, and due to this abuse the Library of Congress has exempted security research on CD DRM from the DMCA.
I'm against copyright abuse, not against copyright. My posting history is consistent on this.
Now only recently you have lied twice (really three times, but two were in the same sentence) and falsely accused me of deceit. Keep going, you're almost up to your regular lie and libel count.
No I didn't, I said quote "you've been pushing free software like Linux since your first post to this site which was an attack against copyright, and followed closely with a vanity title to a thread you created praising Democrats as "ahead of Republicans on open source" when it was learned John Kerry and the DNC ran their operations on Linux."
All true, you came here with an obvious leftist agenda that started with attacks on copyrights, pushing free software, praising Democrats, attacking Christians (oh the horror I brought that up in a tech thread LOL) and ripping practically the entire Bush family. Too bad you don't like being exposed, but if you weren't such a motormouth moonbat pushing leftist philosophy constantly you wouldn't have to deal with it.
For a split second today it looked like you finally made a small step towards rational conservatism by claiming your only interest in Linux is as competition to closed source standards, but by not preceeding that with a mea culpa it was pretty obvious to me it was just more of your typical drivel. As we see now, and as expected, I was precisely correct in my assesment.