Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
The Ancient Greek City States were very independent and competed with each other, however, they abhorred the ideal of domination by Barbarians.
Leonidas' and the other Spartans sacrifice was no half measure, it was meant to slow down the Persians until Greece could unite. The 300 knew they were going to die. The isthmuses leading to the Peloponnese would not have protected Sparta, as once the Athenian Navy was destroyed, the Persian Navy could have landed forces behind anyone at the isthmus. After Thermopylae the Athenians defeated the Persian Navy at Salamas. Also, at Plataea the Greeks defeated the Persians in land Battle. In both cases the Greeks were outnumbered.
http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/salamis/g/Salamis.htm
http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/persianwars/g/Plataea.htm

http://ancienthistory.about.com/cs/weaponswar/p/blpwtherm.htm
60 posted on 03/11/2007 6:38:56 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: GeorgefromGeorgia

A Persian amphibious operation against Laconia (lower Greece) was certainly possible, but I rather doubt that it would have had much of a chance. The coastline is probably too rugged to land a sufficiently large force quickly enough to avoid annihilation on the beach. If it were so easy to do amphibious, why didn't the Great King just land his army in Attica instead of bridging the distant Hellespont? The answer is that any landing has to be far enough from the enemy's center that you, the attacker, can reinforce faster than the defender. Xerxes didn't want a repeat of Marathon.

It's the same reason Eisenhower chose Normandy rather than Calais. The flipside is that a remote landing leaves the chance that the defender can bottle-up the attacker. The Germans tried this in the hedgerows just as the Spartans attempted it at Thermypolae.

You still haven't addressed the question as to why -- if the defense of Greece was paramount -- the Spartans sent only 300? The battle was eventually lost when the Persians flanked the Spartans through an unguarded pass. Even a few hundred more troops would have greatly enhanced the chances for a full repulse. Only 300. It's a riddle wouldn't you agree?


74 posted on 03/12/2007 5:45:10 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson