In re-reading the Enquirer info she gives over there it really explains why Cyril Wecht is all over TV trying to dise Doctor Perper and spin Daniel's death. It appears that "someone" wanted Daniels autopsy to say something and Wecht went along with it and the Bahamian results were faked to agree with Wecht. Am I making any sense here? If they dig Daniel up and re-test to the result the pathologist really found Wecht's reputation is toast... and with it all his media exposure and $$$$$
I haven't figured all that out yet, as far as who is telling the truth and who isn't about the amounts of the drugs in Daniel's system.
How could there be such a huge discrepancy in tox findings between Wecht's and what is said to be the "real" amounts? It's inexplicable.
Problem is, he based his summary on there being small non-lethal amounts of each (+ the mystery drug) which had a synergistic effect on the heart, causing a disrhythmia.
The other findings show 4 more drugs he didn't mention, plus huge amounts of the ones he called non-lethal - any one of which could have been lethal - and was. I just don't know how to comprehend this.
At one point, Wecht said he had been lied to. I guess that means someone, I don't know who, but I'm sure HKS knows, sent him smaller samples or "doctored" tissue or something.