ping
Justice comes in varying forms.
Microsoft is going to have to admit that 'security' is just a relative concept. They still believe it's absolute, and it just isn't, ESPECIALLY in the electronic world.
My guess is that Microsoft will do the latter, judging by its past high levels of customer service.
Activation is the reason I never went with Windows XP. I just didn't want to deal with it. I'm still cruising along with Windows 2000 Pro (although I'm typing this with my Dell laptop using Mepis linux). I remember people being upset with activation when XP came out, but it looks like most folks finally accepted it, just like they will with Vista.
Why is it alright to steal from MS but not for Adobe, Apple or any of the the others?
and this has nothing to do with security.
ping
ping
You would think this would be easy to stop or slow down from the server side. If repeated activation attempts are made in a short time from the same remote address, just block the remote address for a duration.
Which is why I'm boycotting Vista.
Microsoft's continuing arrogance is backed up by the fact that people in general, are nothing but sheep that will baa baa baa, but do nothing to change their buying habits.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Also read that you can install a working vista installation using only the update Vista DVD if you install vista twice over itself on a clean partition.
details here:
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/how-to-install-a-vista-upgrade-on-a-blank-hard-drive-232770.php
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/12/cheap_vista_for_everyone/
Yet another reason to not rent software from MSFT.
I don't see the major problem here for Microsoft. For any given hardware activation key sent to Microsoft, there's only going to be one genuine activation code out of a something like a quintillion superficially-valid ones. If Microsoft includes in the initial Vista release a test that will be passed by one in a million superficially-valid codes, then a random basher that could try millions of codes would probably find some that would pass validation today.
On the other hand, Microsoft could very easily, at any time, incorporate another test into its software that would only be passed by one in a thousand codes that passed the first test. And if people crack that one, Microsoft could implement yet another test that would only be passed by one in a thousand codes that passed the first two. And even after doing that, Microsoft could still pull another one-in-a-thousand out of its hat.